State v. DeSchepper’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2007
2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Goss v. Board of Education · United States v. Williams · Morningside Renewal Council, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission · Irish Northern Aid Committee v. Attorney General of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“respectable body of authority which concludes that the concepts of res judicata and collateral estoppel do not apply to a judgment procured by fraud or perjury. Some suggest that Ashe does not require a state to give collateral-estoppel effect to a verdict of acquittal if the defendant committed perjury to obtain it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Canon“when acquittal of a crime will bar the defendant's subsequent prosecution for perjury for testimony given in his own behalf at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Canon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.