Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Minn. 558 - Williamson v. Furch

Williamson v. Furch’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Berg v. Ullevig · Smith v. Rekucki · Haavig v. Hidding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he question of whether a verdict is adequate must be addressed in the first instance to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its action shall be reversed on appeal only if an abuse of discretion can be demonstrated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.