Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 NJSUPER 1 - State v. Friedman

State v. Friedman’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Coates v. City of Cincinnati · Cree v. Goldstein · Palmer v. City of Euclid · State v. Cameron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an ordinance regulating [loud, disturbing, and unnecessary noises] may utilize general language so long as it notifies the public of the conduct it proscribes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[F]ormulating a specific and precise ordinance regulating noise and disturbances of the peace is a difficult task.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.