State v. Apprendi’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · McMillan v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“2C:44-3 Criteria for sentence of extended term of imprisonment The court shall, upon application of the prosecuting attorney, sentence a person who has been convicted of a crime ... to an extended term if it finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, the grounds in subsection e. e. The defendant in committing the crime acted with a purpose to intimidate an individual or group of individuals because of race, color, gender, handicap, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“no doubt that Pennsylvania's [statute fell] on the permissible side of the constitutional line.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“purpose to use [the weapon] unlawfully against the person or property of another,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.