Smith v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 251 N.J. Super. 236 - CITIBANK, NA v. Errico · CARTERET SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N, FA v. Davis · 206 N.J. Super. 637 - Morsemere Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Nicolaou · 271 N.J. Super. 56 - RTC v. Berman Industries · 249 N.J. Super. 234 - Security Sav. Bank v. Tranchitella
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[This ease] is not governed by the express provisions of N.J.S.A 2A:50-3 nor by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Plaintiff is not a secured judgment creditor. She is an unsecured judgment creditor who wants her money. That being so, what are her obligations to the judgment debtor? Although statutes relating to foreclosure and secured transactions do not bind an unsecured judgment creditor, case law interpreting those statutes provides guidance. From those cases some rules emerge: (1) an arms length sale may serve as a basis for value; (2) a judgment creditor is obligated to act fairly in the disposition of assets, and (3) the court has equitable authority to preclude unjust enrichment in the form of windfall or double recovery. [Id. at 32, 697 A.2d 960 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.