Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 NJSUPER 26 - Smith v. Lopez

Smith v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 251 N.J. Super. 236 - CITIBANK, NA v. Errico · CARTERET SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N, FA v. Davis · 206 N.J. Super. 637 - Morsemere Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Nicolaou · 271 N.J. Super. 56 - RTC v. Berman Industries · 249 N.J. Super. 234 - Security Sav. Bank v. Tranchitella

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[This ease] is not governed by the express provisions of N.J.S.A 2A:50-3 nor by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Plaintiff is not a secured judgment creditor. She is an unsecured judgment creditor who wants her money. That being so, what are her obligations to the judgment debtor? Although statutes relating to foreclosure and secured transactions do not bind an unsecured judgment creditor, case law interpreting those statutes provides guidance. From those cases some rules emerge: (1) an arms length sale may serve as a basis for value; (2) a judgment creditor is obligated to act fairly in the disposition of assets, and (3) the court has equitable authority to preclude unjust enrichment in the form of windfall or double recovery. [Id. at 32, 697 A.2d 960 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.