Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 NW2D 111 - State v. Brammer

State v. Brammer’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
3
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Renville (1985), State v. Nelson (1998)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 59 state decisions

40019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Castenada · State v. Shank & Bradley · Kramer v. United States · State v. Dietz · State v. Barr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he legislature intended the sexual contact statute to apply to touching incidental to rape. The obvious intent of the legislature is to deal with those who molest young children for sexual gratification without raping them. Sexual contact is a separate and distinct offense. The legislature imposed a more severe penalty for it than for rape.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of a court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he plain error rule must be applied cautiously and only in exceptional circumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.