Zipperle v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2019
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grayson v. Stith · Davis v. Rowland · Faulkner v. Kirkes · McGill v. McGill · Aggers v. Bridges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Davis v. Rowland , 206 Okl. 257 , 242 P.2d 716,717 , it is said in the third paragraph of the syllabus: 'Where jurisdiction of the defendant in an action is sought to be obtained by publication service alone, the affidavit for publication, as well as the publication notice, are matters jurisdictional, and, in order to obtain jurisdiction of the defendant in such case, both the affidavit for publication and the publication notice must comply with the provisions of the statute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. VELASCO v. RUIZ
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.