Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 S.C. 409 - State v. Sims

State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably State v. Kelsey (1998), State v. Burdette (1999)

4 federal appellate · 87 state decisions

470199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Payton v. New York · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Boyde v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here, the officer’s testimony was not hearsay as it was not offered to prove that Sims intended to kill the woman in question. Rather, the evidence was offered to explain the officer’s actions in restraining Sims when he reached towards his pocket. The evidence was not hearsay and was properly admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he trial judge has a duty to review all statutory mitigating circumstances and instruct the jury as to any which may be supported by the evidence and not merely those requested by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence is relevant if it tends to establish or makes more or less probable some matter in issue upon which it directly or indirectly bears.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.