Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 So. 2d 146 - Durham v. State

304 So. 2d 146 - Durham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Williams v. State · 286 So. 2d 244 - Hutchins v. State · Hines v. State · 298 So. 2d 540 - Lewis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Thus, where a court in sentencing a defendant to imprisonment for a designated period in the county jail provides that after serving a stated portion thereof the defendant should be on probation for some period, the penalty for a violation of probation would call for return of the defendant to the county jail for the unserved balance of the jail sentence, or such part thereof as the court should determine... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.