¶1In re: Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, State of Louisiana, applying for writ of certiorari.
¶2Writ denied. We are unable to say that the trial judge erred.
¶3is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. The officers had adequate cause to stop and frisk the defendant.
¶4dissents from the denial of this writ. There was probable cause to search and frisk. See my dissent in State v. Saia, La., 302 So.2d 869, decided October 11, 1974.