Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 SW2D 371 - Albin v. Hughes

Albin v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1983

10 state decisions

401957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rorschach v. Pitts · National Life Co. v. Rice · National Life Co. v. Rice · Old Lincoln County Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hall · Pavlidis v. Bishop & Babcock Sales Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our Supreme Court has stated that the statute in question would hardly be taken as intending that a single obligation would be performable in two distinct counties for venue purposes. Rorschach v. Pitts, 151 Tex. 215 , 248 S.W.2d 120 , at page 123. This Court has heretofore held that the phrase ‘a particular county’ means a county that is fixed and certain, made so by the terms of the contract, and not subject to be changed at the will of the obligee. Bryson v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co., Tex.Civ.App., 61 S.W.2d 147 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A written contract which leaves to either party, the obligor or the obligee, the privilege of selecting the place of performance in one of two or more counties is not, in our opinion, a contract performable in a ‘particular county, expressly naming such county, or a definite place therein, by such writing’ as required by sub. 5.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.