Shipley v. Shipley’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Seaton v. Seaton · 8 Ark. App. 177 - Linehan v. Linehan · Beasley v. Beasley · 4 Ark. App. 266 - Stout v. Stout · 25 Ark. App. 221 - Kunz v. Jarnigan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The independent property settlement will usually be in the form of a separate written agreement, Seaton v. Seaton, supra, but it may be in the form of a complete property settlement which is dictated into the record. Kunz v. Jarnigan, 25 Ark. App. 221 , 756 S.W.2d 913 (1988). Obviously, if the parties intend for an agreement which is dictated into the record to constitute an independent agreement they should so state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.