In Re Precision Concepts, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on 26 663 74447 Allegheny International Inc · In the Matter Of: Universal Seismic Associates, Inc. · In Re Spruill · Burns v. City of Winston-Salem · In Re Mall at One Associates, L.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Except as provided in subsections (e)(2), (f), (g), (h) and (i) of this section, if such objection to a claim is made, the court, after notice and a hearing, shall determine the amount of such claim in lawful currency of the United States as of the date of the filing of the petition, and shall allow such claim in such amount, except to the extent that— (3) if such claim is for a tax assessed against property of the estate, such claim exceeds the value of the interest of the estate in such property;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of this section is to prevent the depletion of the debtor’s estate by the payment of taxes assessed against property that has no value to the estate and is likely to be abandoned by the trustee. This section is designed to prevent injustice to unsecured creditors and to prevent a windfall to mortgagees and other lienors who would unfairly benefit from the payment of property taxes that would otherwise remain charges on the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was essential to the continued operation of the company, resulting in realization of income and a successful § 363 sale. The use of this equipment resulted in positive cash flow to the company in an amount of approximately $1,000,000. The fact that the property was over encumbered does not mean that the property was of no value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Shefa, LLC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.