In Re Comeaux’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 104 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Stoulig v. Traina · Christo v. Yellin (In Re Christo) · In Re Marcus · In Re: Lee Christo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“indicates the exemption of only a singular payment, even in circumstances in which multiple payments from separate torts exist, is speculative at best. It seems more plausible to this Court that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Melching“when combined with the use of the singular term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Melching
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.