Frank Drago v. A/s Inger, and Third-Party v. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc., Third-Party and Illinois Atlantic Corp., Third-Partydefendant-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis
305 F.2d 139 · 1962
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1992 · most notably Federal Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co. (1969), Peter F. Damanti v. A/s Inger, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Illinois Atlantic Corp., Third-Party (1963)
40 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co. · Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik Fisser · Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Dugan & McNamara Inc · American Export Lines, Inc. v. John Revel, Whitehall Terminal Corporation v. United States of America, American Export Lines, Inc., and John Revel, and American Export Lines, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. United States of America and Whitehall Terminal Corporation, Cross-Appellees · Booth Steamship Co. v. Meier & Oelhaf Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“duty to remedy, or have the ship's crew remedy, a dangerous condition that exists for a period sufficient for the stevedore to have constructive notice thereof”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There is no substance in the appeal by Daniels & Kennedy, Inc., from the dismissal of its cross-claim against Illinois Atlantic Corp.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.