Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 305 F.2d 343 - Meredith v. Fair

Meredith v. Fair’s Empirical Analysis

305 F.2d 343 · 1962

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably United States v. Barnett (1964), Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance (1987)

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

240196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Rodriguez v. New York · Ex parte Poresky · Plessy v. Ferguson · Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ince at least 1958, when Ludley v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, [ 150 F.Supp. 900 (E.D.La.1957), aff 'd, 252 F.2d 372 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 819 , 79 S.Ct. 31 , 3 L.Ed.2d 61 (1958),] was decided_ If the Board had any doubt about it, that doubt should have been resolved in 1959 when a similar requisite of the University of Georgia was held to be unconstitutional. Hunt v. Arnold, [ 172 F.Supp. 847 (N.D.Ga.1959).] We regard the continued insistence on the requirement as demonstrable evidence of a State and University policy of segregation that was applied to Meredith.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.