Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 305 F.2d 811 - A. J. Curtis & Co. v. D. W. Falls, Inc.

A. J. Curtis & Co. v. D. W. Falls, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

305 F.2d 811 · 1962

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2010

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

80196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc. · Minnesota v. United States · Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Willard · Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Ins. · Capecci v. Joseph Capecci, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * any civil action brought in a State Court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant * * * to the district court of the United States for the district * * * embracing the place where such action is pending.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.