Tinder v. Pinkerton Security’s Empirical Analysis
305 F.3d 728 · 2002
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 11 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. (2005), Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. (2009)
16 federal appellate · 11 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3 · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc. · Posey v. Skyline Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party cannot avoid compelled arbitration by generally denying the facts upon which the right to arbitration rests; the party must identify specific evidence in the record demonstrating a material factual dispute for trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“at-will employees give adequate consideration for employer promises that modify or supplant the at-will employment relationship by remaining on the job.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he party opposing arbitration must identify a triable issue of fact concerning the existence of the agreement in order to obtain a trial on the merits of the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.