Ford v. Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis
305 F.3d 875 · 2002
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
October 2003
most recently cited
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Rose v. Lundy · Duncan v. Walker · Schlup v. Delo · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a denial of the request would likely constitute error,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court's error in failing properly and fully to inform Ford about his options with respect to the mixed petitions and in misleading him as to the legal effect of a dismissal of his petitions were `extraordinary circumstances'... that would require equitable tolling of AEDPA's statute of limitations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court, when informing a habeas petitioner of his options with respect to a mixed petition, should alert the petitioner to the one-year limitations period of AEDPA and to the fact that a portion of that period has already elapsed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.