305 F. Supp. 2d 49 - Meng v. Schwartz’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Allen v. McCurry · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ismissal of the plaintiffs' ... negligence claims also disposes of any underlying tort to which the civil conspiracy claim could have attached, necessitating its dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.