305 F. Supp. 2d 64 - Herron v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Chandler v. Roudebush · Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp. · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School · Schuler v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to dismiss is not automatically transformed into a motion for summary judgment simply because matters outside the pleadings are filed. The issue is, rather, whether the Court took cognizance of them.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)). 2 . Judicial Watch argues that “[wjhether an agency has a policy or practice is not a legal conclusion ... that can be judged on the pleadings,” but instead presents a disputed material fact that requires”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.