Azima v. RAK Inv. Auth.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1603 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1604 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976)
Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of Nigeria · Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc. · Saudi Arabia v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“careful to avoid making any representation that it would necessarily consent to the [alternative court's] jurisdiction with respect to the [plaintiff's] claims”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Mr. Azima has recently provided negotiation assistance to RAKIA on an informal basis which RAKIA recognises and appreciates”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“any dispute or claim arising out of, or in connection with, [the Agreement] or its subject matter or formation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.