Fogarty v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 1986 · most notably Camdenton Consolidated School District No. 6 Ex Rel. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. v. New York Casualty Co. (1937), New Britain Lumber Co. v. American Surety Co. (1931)
6 federal appellate · 37 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aull v. St. Louis Trust Co. · State ex rel. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Broaddus · State ex rel. Sale v. Nortoni · &198tna Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne · Winkleblack v. National Exchange Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘ ‘ The rule in this. State is that in construing a statutory bond the provisions of the statutes must be read into it and construed as a part of it. ‘When parties execute a statutory bond they are chargeable with notice of all provisions of the statute relating to their obligation, and those provisions are to be read into the bond as its terms and conditions. * * * These provisions are a part of the bond of which both principal and surety must take notice.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.