State v. Caliguiri’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Leonardis · State v. Tischio · State v. Leonardis · State v. Bender · State v. Nwobu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the present case there is a factual dispute concerning whether or not the defendant was intoxicated. Therefore, the state’s reliance in the present ease on it[ ]s version of disputed facts i[s] improper. In the present case only one reason remains for the state’s refusal to consent to enrollment. This was not a victimless crime. As to the state’s consideration of defendant as an individual which would be weighed against the one reason for refusal, the state only refers to such factors in conclusory terms. The state failed to analyze the statutory and guideline factors of the offense and the offender. The state did not consider whether there was [a] showing of a history of DWI offenses or any other factor which would impede her amenability to rehabilitation. They simply repeated that the nature of the offense [a]s drunk driving outweighed all other factors ... that could be considered in defendant’s favor. This case certainly involved a victim and that fact cannot be overlooked. However, despite that fact, the defendant is entitled to consideration as an individual. The reasons in this case weigh heavily in favor of admitting defendant. Defendant has no prior criminal record, voluntarily underwent a substance abuse evaluation at Trinitas Hospital, completed an intake at Proceed, and began a 16-week alcohol treatment program on February 22nd, 2005. She has demonstrated both an amenability to correction and/or responsiveness to treatment in light of the proofs submitted today”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.