Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 305 NW2D 311 - Resident v. Noot

Resident v. Noot’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 30 Cal. 4th 798 - Olszewski v. Scripps Health (2003), Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership (1984)

25 state decisions

1101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst · White v. Beal · Norman v. St. Clair · State v. Dancer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the language subject to construction is so technical in nature that only a specialized agency has the experience and expertise needed to understand it, when the language is ambiguous or when the agency interpretation is one of long standing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the Medicaid program was first established, many states were unable to bear the entire cost of providing medical care to the needy, notwithstanding the states’ receipt of federal funds. The charges imposed by the nursing homes were, therefore, met by a combination of government funds and forced payments from an M.A. recipient, here relatives or friends, called supplementation. Prior to 1971, the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare approved state medicaid plans including supplementation, so long as a state could show that it had existing supplemental arrangements with nursing homes and that in the absence of such arrangements it would be unable to attract a sufficient number of nursing homes into the program. In 1969, the Secretary promulgated a regulation giving those states that included supplementation in their Medicaid plans a limited amount of time to phase out the supplementation portion of their plans. 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 (a)(6) (1972). The regulation was a response to the Congressional concern with supplementation. There are wide variations among the States in the manner of financing the cost of nursing home care provided to the needy. In some States, the full cost of care is paid. In others, a negotiated rate is developed which may or may not approximate the reasonable cost or reasonable charges for the services provided. Some States, however, depend upon the supplementation of the State agency’s below-cost allowances for care with contributions from relat”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.