People v. Feld’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 1994 · most notably United States v. Turner (1975), United States v. Lemonakis (1973)
13 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fitzpatrick v. International Railway Co. · People v. . Jung Hing · People v. . Katz · People v. . Sweeney · People v. Singer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there must be agreement about its accuracy, and a pretrial meeting in chambers may sometimes be necessary to determine if this is possible. (Footnote omitted.) People v. Feld, 305 N.Y. 322, 331 , 113 N.E.2d 440, 444 (1953): When the recordings were played back for the benefit of the trial jurors there was furnished to the court, counsel and each juror a mimeographed transcript of the recorded conversations . . . These had been made by an official stenographer who testified that they were made from the original recordings and were accurate”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When the recordings were played back for the benefit of the trial jurors there was furnished to the court, counsel and each juror a mimeographed transcript of the recorded conversations . . . These had been made by an official stenographer who testified that they were made from the original recordings and were accurate "word for word". Before being admitted into evidence, the transcripts were compared by the court and the counsel not in the presence of the jury or members of the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.