State v. Milbradt’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 628 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Foret (1993), State v. Rimmasch (1989)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We have said before, and we will say it again, but this time with emphasis-we really mean it-no psychotherapist may render an opinion on whether a witness is credible in any trial conducted in this state."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]e expressly hold that in Oregon a witness, expert or otherwise, may not give an opinion on whether he believes a witness is telling the truth.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Nooth · State v. Isom“We suggest in the future that if counsel attempts to elicit [testimony commenting on the credibility of a witness] the trial judge, sua sponte, should summarily cut off the inquiry before a jury is contaminated by it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.