King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1981
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hopper v. State · Linzey v. State · Crossett v. State · Parris v. State · Matlock v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order to convict an accused charged with ‘operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor’ it is not required that the jury find that the accused was intoxicated or drunk, but only that such driver be ‘under the influence of intoxicating liquor’ * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The trial court should not sustain a demurrer to the evidence, or a motion to direct a verdict, where there is proof tending reasonably to sustain the allegations of the information.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kent v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.