Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

305 S.C. 115

406 S.E.2d 356

Key v. Currie

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1991

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1991-07-08

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Although Article V, § 5, of the South Carolina Constitution vests this Court with the authority to issue extraordinary writs and entertain actions in its original jurisdiction, this Court’s primary function is to act as an appellate court to review appeals from the trial courts.... [T]his Court has indicated it will not entertain matters in its original jurisdiction where the matter can be entertained in the trial courts of this State. Only when there is an extraordinary reason such as a question of significant public interest or an emergency will this Court exercise its original jurisdiction.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Wilson v. Moore, No. 98-6577

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-07-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Simpson v. State (1998), Martin v. State (1995)

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

150199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

¶2 Plaintiff seeks to have this Court grant a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to credit him with time served prior to his criminal trial. We refuse to entertain this matter in our original jurisdiction.

¶3 In recent months, the number of petitions seeking to have this Court exercise its original jurisdiction has increased dramatically. We take this opportunity to emphasize the limitations we have placed on our original jurisdiction.

¶4 Although Article V, § 5, of the South Carolina Constitution vests this Court with the authority to issue extraordinary writs and entertain actions in its original jurisdiction, this Court’s primary function is to act as an appellate court to review appeals from the trial courts. In Rule 229, SCACR, this Court has indicated it will not entertain matters in its original jurisdiction where the matter can be entertained in the trial courts of this State. Only when there is an extraordinary reason such as a question of significant public interest or an emergency will this Court exercise its original jurisdiction.

¶5 In the present matter, there is no extraordinary reason to exercise the Court’s original jurisdiction. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed.

¶6 It is so ordered.

/305/sc/115 · .json · Public domain