Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

305 S.C. 187

In re Alexander

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 16, 1991

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1991-08-16

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2007

17 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-08-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina and has petitioned this Court to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR, because he has become unable to continue to practice law.

¶3The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court. El-dridge Inman, Esquire, is appointed pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent and his clients.

¶4This Order, when served on any bank maintaining a trust and/or escrow account of respondent, will serve as notice to the bank that Eldridge Inman has been duly appointed by this Court.

¶5It is so ordered.

/305/sc/187 · .json · Public domain