Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

305 So. 2d 13

Frost v. Dascher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 1974

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1974-12-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1989

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to assert his proprietary interest in the corporate stock which is the subject matter of this action or his right to assert such claims as he may have against the estate herein in the probate court.

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR, J., concur.JOHNSON, J., dissents.
JOHNSON, Judge

¶2(dissenting):

¶3I must disagree with the conclusion of the majority opinion by this Court in this case. There were too many disputed facts to warrant the entry of a summary judgment. I think the defendant-appellant should have been given the chance to explain the circumstances and facts surrounding the whole transaction. Therefore, I’d reverse for a hearing on the merits.

/305/so2d/13 · .json · Public domain