305 So. 2d 132
Decided December 20, 1974
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1974-12-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1976
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“The rationale of the so-called `majority' opinion is not accepted but we find no error in the result under the facts.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 330 So. 2d 649 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Relies on Eymard v. McKinnon
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1974-12-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In re: Cheryl Eymard, wife of/and Hugh Eymard applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 302 So.2d 56.
¶2Writ denied. The rationale of the so called “majority” opinion is not accepted but we find no error in the result under the facts.