Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 305 SO2D 296 - Ricketts v. State

Ricketts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · 194 So. 2d 250 - Westberry v. Daves Auto Parts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Some of the factors are whether it was necessary for the prosecution to refer to the informer in the presentation of the case, or whether the informer’s existence was first brought out on cross-examination by the defendant; whether the informer was an ‘active participant’ in the offense with which the defendant is charged or is a ‘mere informer’ who supplies a ‘lead’; whether the accused admits or does not deny guilt; and whether there is independent evidence of the accused’s guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"to amplify or contradict the testimony of the witnesses for the State."];”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.