¶1Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation as it more than conforms to the standards and qualifications set out in Crossin v. State, 244 So.2d 142 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1971).
¶2Affirmed.
305 So. 2d 874
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 10, 1975
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-01-10
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1975
Relies on 244 So. 2d 142 - Johnson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1975-01-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation as it more than conforms to the standards and qualifications set out in Crossin v. State, 244 So.2d 142 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1971).
¶2Affirmed.