Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 F.2d 799 - Morgan v. Udall

Morgan v. Udall’s Empirical Analysis

306 F.2d 799 · 1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 1978
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Costello v. United States · Chapman v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co. · Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the Interior · California Company v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Secretary's decision would be subject to judicial review only if it were shown that he had acted arbitrarily or unreasonably or that his interpretation of what constitutes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.