Oliver v. Udall’s Empirical Analysis
306 F.2d 819 · 1962
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2002 · most notably United States v. Wheeler (1978), McDaniel v. Paty (1978)
10 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 201 (ADAMHA Reorganization Act)
Relies on Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Poe v. Ullman · Reynolds v. States · Williams v. Lee · Alabama State Federation of Labor Local v. McAdory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is our view that the Secretary’s approval of the tribal action in 1959 was entirely in keeping with that abstinence from federal intervention in the internal affairs of an Indian tribe which the law clearly requires. The Secretary had simply recognized the valid governing authority of the Tribal Council.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dodge v. Nakai“the management of all Indian affairs and of all matters arising out of Indian relations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.