Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 F.2d 882 - Mrs. Nancy W. Box v. Mrs. Martha C. Swindle

Mrs. Nancy W. Box v. Mrs. Martha C. Swindle’s Empirical Analysis

306 F.2d 882 · 1962

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2008

14 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

6019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. Klaas · University City, Mo. v. Home Fire & Marine Ins. · Wilburn v. Gordon · Baltimore & O. R. v. O'Neill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court charges the jury that it is the law of the State of Mississippi that a signal of intention to turn right or left shall be given continuously for a reasonable distance before turning. This is a law relating to the operation of a motor vehicle. It provides that a motorist is not only under a duty to keep a proper lookout for other vehicles using the highway, but also not to turn his vehicle from a direct course upon the highway unless such movement can be made with reasonable safety, and then after giving a proper signal by hand or proper signal mechanically so that the other vehicle will not be affected by such movement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.