Santiesteban v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.’s Empirical Analysis
306 F.2d 9 · 1962
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably Rugg v. McCarty (1970), Steele v. Offshore Shipbuilding, Inc. (1989)
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Meredith v. City of Winter Haven · Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance Society · Barry v. Edmunds · Cason v. Baskin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is settled that the right of privacy is personal and does not extend to members of the family unless they are brought into unjustifiable publicity, here not alleged, and then the right is in them. * * *” Santiesteban v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 306 F.2d 9 (5th Cir. 1962).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Florida authorities demonstrate that the right of privacy is recognized in Florida as it is in an overwhelming number of jurisdictions in this country.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.