Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 F.3d 1127 - Forkkio v. Powell

Forkkio v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

306 F.3d 1127 · 2002

Citation profile

280
cited by 280 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 218 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 280 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Holcomb v. Powell (2006), Czekalski v. Peters (2007)

31 federal appellate · 218 district · 1 state decisions

1690200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Regina C. Brown, v. Kenneth D. Brody, Chairman, Export-Import Bank of the United States, · Sonya G. Stewart, v. Donald L. Evans, in His Official Capacity As Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 280 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “experience[ ] materially adverse consequences affecting the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or future employment opportunities such that a reasonable trier of fact could find objectively tangible harm.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. McNair v. Dist. of Columbia · Cooper v. Nielsen
  2. “'purely subjective injuries,' such as dissatisfaction with a reassignment, public humiliation, or loss of reputation, are not adverse actions,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Carter-Frost v. Dist. of Columbia · Achagzai v. Broad. Bd. of Governors
  3. “[R]eassignment with significantly different responsibilities ... generally indicates an adverse action.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Carter-Frost v. Dist. of Columbia · Wells v. Colorado Department of Transportation

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.