Pratt v. Greiner’s Empirical Analysis
306 F.3d 1190 · 2002
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Wade · Coleman v. Thompson · Rose v. Lundy · Picard v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. The limitation period shall run from the late[r] of— (1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final; [or] (3)the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] conviction becomes final for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d) upon expiration of the ninety-day period to petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.” 306 F.3d 1190 , 1195 n. 1 (2d Cir.2002). Dillon did not petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. 4 . According to Langone,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dillon v. Conway“The time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.