Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 F.3d 1256 - Wit v. Berman

Wit v. Berman’s Empirical Analysis

306 F.3d 1256 · 2002

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dunn v. Blumstein · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Burdick v. Takushi · Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15 · McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is a matter of virtually uniform recognition that, where state constitutional and statutory provisions limit the right to vote to the residents of a given geographical area, the term residence should be equated with the concept of domicile”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Wit v. Berman , 306 F.3d 1256 , 1261 (2d Cir. 2002) (citing Annotation, Residence of Students for Voting Purposes , 44 A.L.R.3d 797 § 2, at 801 (1972), for the proposition that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “some political organizations might well find it in their interests to attempt to register large numbers of persons with only marginal connections to the electoral district”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.