Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 F.3d 241 - United States v. Stone

United States v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

306 F.3d 241 · 2002

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Ring (2003), United States v. Matthews (2002)

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

420200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. · Mickens v. Taylor · National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Principi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`because [Section] 924(e)(1) does not create a separate offense but is merely a sentence enhancement provision,' neither the statute nor the Constitution requires a jury finding on the existence of the three previous felony convictions required for the enhancement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “who violates section 922(g) of this title and has three previous convictions ... for a violent felony or a serious drug offense, or both, ... shall be ... imprisoned not less than fifteen years”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.