In Re David Cavanaugh’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Billings v. Comm'r (2006), In re eSpeed, Inc. Securities Litigation (2005)
12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal. · Miller Superintendent Pendleton Correctional Facility v. French · Bauman v. United States District Court · In Re: Cendant Corporation Litigation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(aa) has either filed the complaint or made a motion in response to a notice; (bb) in the determination of the court, has the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class; and (cc) otherwise satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is subject to unique defenses that render such plaintiff incapable of adequately representing the class.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[s]o long as the plaintiff with the largest losses satisfies the typicality and adequacy requirements, he is entitled to lead plaintiff status, even if the district court is convinced that some other plaintiff would do a better job.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.