Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 FSUPP 1329 - Caver v. Kropp

Caver v. Kropp’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Preston v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even if there were probable cause to-believe that the envelopes contained narcotics, petitioner was under arrest and' the envelopes were in the possession of the police officers. There was no danger that the contents of the envelopes would be used to effectuate an escape or that evidence would be destroyed. Under these circumstances, the police officers should have secured a search warrant prior to opening the sealed envelopes.” 306 F.Supp. at 1332.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.