Reisner v. Lonsdorf’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Plaintiff argues, on the authority of Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 388 F.2d 973 , that the mere ‘review’ of a Selective Service file of itself constitutes a reopening of a registrant’s classification. On that premise, he takes the position that having so ‘reopened’ his classification, defendants were required by Section 1625.14, 32 CFR, to cancel plaintiff’s induction notice, and that having failed to perform this ministerial duty, they are subject to mandamus by this Court. Plaintiff misreads Miller . * * * ******”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Lee