Horne v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Munsey v. Clough · Monrosa v. Carbon Black Export, Inc. · Innes v. Tobin · Robert Tickle v. L. R. Summers, Sheriff of Pulaski County, Virginia · Giles v. Merrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“****** Mr. Horne * * * is permitted to seek a hearing before a judge of a Tennessee court of record, if he states that he desires to test the legality of his arrest under the Governor’s [rendition] warrant, T.C.A. § 40-1020. There, he may present the questions presented here. In any event, the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (b), (c), that Mr. Horne exhaust his remedies in the courts of Tennessee before applying to this Court, prevents this Court’s granting the writ. Exhaustion of state remedies applies to extradition proceedings. Giles v. Merrill, C.A.IOth (1963), 322 F.2d 786, 787 [2]; Tickle v. Summers, C.A.4th (1959), 270 F.2d 848, 850 [1].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.