Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 FSUPP2D 459 - Langella v. Bush

Langella v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Allen v. McCurry · Butz v. Economou · Weinberger v. Salfi · United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), plaintiff carries the burden of establishing that subject matter jurisdiction exists over his complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.