Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 FSUPP3D 579 - Herrick v. Grindr, LLC

Herrick v. Grindr, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · Stutman v. Chemical Bank · Fischer v. Maloney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An [interactive computer service provider] may not be held liable for so-called 'neutral assistance,' or tools and functionality that are available equally to bad actors and the app's intended users”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.