Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 N.W.2d 876 - Schmidt v. Forell

Schmidt v. Forell’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A. · Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc. · Swenson v. Chevron Chemical Company · In Re Estate of Shabley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In applying the clearly erroneous standard we must bear in mind that our function is not to decide factual questions de novo. The question for the appellate court is not whether it would have made the same findings the trial court did, but whether on the entire evidence it is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`[a]lthough there was evidence relating to loss of earning capacity, the proof was insufficient to establish those damages with reasonable certainty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.