Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2005
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 80 Okla. Crim. 194 - O'Dell v. State · 70 Okla. Crim. 68 - Camp v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 44 - Webster v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 18 - Raper v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 73 - Hodge v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] police officer acting to preserve the peace and prevent crime has the right to make reasonable inquiry of persons observed under circumstances which reasonably suggest that a crime has been, or is being committed!,] [and may stop] motorists when [the] officer is convinced that a vehicle is being operated in a way which menaces the driving public. An officer may stop a moving vehicle not only when he directly observes a violation of the law, but also when specific articulable facts in dicate probable cause to believe a violation of the law is present. If, after properly stopping the vehicle, the officer observes a misdemeanor, the subsequent arrest is lawful.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.